Russell Hobbs 3.5L Stainless Steel Slow Cooker $29 (Was $49) @ Target - Online or In Store

Related Stores

Target Australia

• 

  Diji1 on 16/09/2016 - 18:52

  I avoid this brand because its badly designed tat IME. YMMV.

  • 

    AussieGargain on 16/09/2016 - 19:18

    +1

    Kettles and blenders are pretty good. They aimed mid-to-high market previously, but produced a lot of subpar goods lately. Don't know why. $29 for a slow cooker is pretty good tho.

  • 

    cryptos on 16/09/2016 - 19:26

    Not much to a slow cooker tho

  • 

    freefall101 on 16/09/2016 - 19:55

    +2

    it never breaks, it just becomes a somewhat slower cooker than usual.

    • 

      magic8ballgag on 16/09/2016 - 21:15

      +1

      So it becomes better as it ages?

      • 

        scrimshaw on 17/09/2016 - 00:50

        No, it just becomes smellier, farts and whinges a lot, refuses to do any housework and eventually you'll want a divorce.

      • 

        magic8ballgag on 17/09/2016 - 09:13

        @scrimshaw:

        That escalated quickly.

      • 

        Skinnerr on 17/09/2016 - 15:02

        @tranqme: And then the slow cooker gets half your shit.

  • 

    [Deactivated] on 17/09/2016 - 09:20

    I got this one. Works fine so far.

• 

  railspider on 16/09/2016 - 21:36

  3.5L is too small for a slow cooker. Really need 5L at a minimum if you want to slow cook full pork shoulders or lamb legs.

• 

  altomic on 16/09/2016 - 22:14

  what's the power usage on these?

• 

  Wolfy on 16/09/2016 - 23:24

  Looks to be cheap slow cooker that is smaller smaller other virtually identical products:
  Target Essentials $25 https://www.target.com.au/p/essentials-slow-cooker-tessc1322…
  Kmart $20 http://www.kmart.com.au/product/stainless-steel-slow-cooker-…

• 

  [Deactivated] on 16/09/2016 - 23:26

  I would say for the strictly single it would be perfect,
  Comfort food,
  Crock on