Unfortunately I have to announce that there is no winner for this week's competition due to lack of participation.
We usually run competitions each week (see this forum post for details), and draw the winners on Thursday at 12pm. However, due to lack of participation, I have to call a halt on the competition.
Overall we only have 3 deals submitted last week that were not submitted by me, other merchants or other websites, and Jaxx, a winner from the past two weeks, was one of them, which excludes him from winning again. That means I have to give the two prizes to two remaining submitter… Well, we can't call it a competition, can we?
The competition shall resume next week, and hopefully we will get more submissions on deals and coupons. To compensate this week's absense, I will give $40 to the most popular/most voted deal next week, plus two random winners with $20 each. Participants from this week will still be in the draw.
—Scott
1) Can't you just give the two submitters, $20 bucks each, for random winners & do no random winners, next week?
2) Would one person get $40 or would the two highest voted offers get $20 each?
3) Re - "Well, we can’t call it a competition, can we?" You could, because some week people find bargains and some weeks they don't, you can't expect everyone to find a bargain every week?
4) What happens if it happens next week and the week after & you cancel it over and over. It wouldn't be fair to this week submitters?