So, 6 months ago the missus cracked her phone screen, got it repaired at a kiosk for $250.
Within a month the screen was acting up, so she took it back - they stressed that if she had any issues after 3 months, they would not cover any repairs.
Over the last month the screen had issues turning on, temporarily loses colour etc. It seems to be getting worse.
My question is - is 3 months warranty unreasonable if the parts used where faulty? For a phone repair, I'd expect the new parts used to be fitting for the equipment.
Is there anywhere I can reference to support this argument?
I did advise to get one of these cool Xiaomi phones, but apparently it's "not a Samsung". At least she's not an apple fan ;)
Thanks ozbargain crew! Love you since '08
Not from a shopping centre kiosk… You won't have much recourse, and a 3 month warranty was nice of them to begin with. If you wanted to have something to fall back on, you would have taken it to Samsung to fix.
n.b. I have changed the screen and battery in my htc one m7. They are such a PITA that most places won't touch them. But in doing so, I have to accept that if the parts are faulty, or low quality, it was my decision to do an aftermarket repair…