Hi,
Gazumping is defined by Fair trading as:
Gazumping occurs when you have a verbal agreement with an agent or seller to buy a property at an agreed price but the property is not sold to you in the end. This usually happens when the vendor (the person selling the property) has decided to sell the property to someone else, usually for a higher amount. The agent is legally obliged to pass on to the vendor any further offers received for the property up until the exchange of contracts.
If you are gazumped, neither the agent nor the vendor is obliged to compensate you for any money you may have spent on legal advice, inspection reports, finance application costs or inquiries.
Before participating in purchasing an apt, we would always question the agent if they practice Gazumping or Dutch Auction.
Each time they would say that they do not condone this practice and insist that they will never do it.
BUT, they end up ALWAYS doing it to us. Every time. They employ delay tatics (not sending us the sale contract, but saying that they have), excuses, and they ultimately blame the vendor saying that it was the vendor's decision.
We feel cheated because we would offer a premium so that the vendor accept, but they don't exchange even though they have agreed to exchange. They wait for higher offers using our strong offer as leverage. We would pay for solicitor fees and travel costs and lose so much of our valuable time.
Is this common practice?
Is there a place where we can name and shame agencies that regularly conducted these practices?
We would like to hear advise on how to be successful in purchasing our home/apt without falling into these traps and wasting money on solicitor fees.
Thank you.
Location = Sydney, LOL