if you could choose one, which one would it be? I absolute love Fallout being the original 3(I've played the 2 as well) my fav of all time, but being a fan of Star wars I'm in doubt which one to get haha… I know they are very different but after buying 2 dud ones (Titanfall and Watchdogs which I hated) I'm a bit in doubt…. go!
Fallout 4 or Star Wars: Battlefront
lucas001 on 06/11/2015 - 15:37
Comments
I am going FO4 mainly based on my liking for FO3. I didn't like New Vegas..and I don't really trust EA. Let the game release and let me read few reviews about Battlefront first.
I didn't like New Vegas either… weird..
The world was too civilized for me in NV. Unlike FO3…which gave the ruins and apocalypse feeling way more. I simply couldn't get myself to like New Vegas. New Vegas was also developed by Obsidian instead of Bethesda. Maybe because of that?
yeah maybe that was the reason (not being Bethesda)… the game had a completely different feel…
Agreed on both your post.
Single player option won't be available on the Star Wars Battlefront apparently. So I put a pre-order on the Fallout 4.
Why not COD:BO3 ?
I was tempted at this tbh but then I remembered that they eventually annoy the crap outta me. I'm not bad at them, I usually end up with a 1.60 kdr over time but they are usually so friggin glitchy, the objective based modes full of kdr whores and generally full of assholes.
I'm buying Fallout 4 and Star Wars as I'm a big fan of each though I have my reservations on SW quality.
The general reception for games like CoD and Assassin's Creed should speak for itself. People go to things like the steam page and metacritic to bomb it with reviews for a reason. I've always stood by the moniker that "CoD is a decent game but it's an awful product".
What I'm saying is that CoD has 54% positive on steam out of 2000 reviews for a reason. What? Ya'll don't know about Kevin?
The bad reviews on steam is cause the port to pc was shit. the game play itself is great.
have a read of the bad reviews and you will notice all complain about it not working properly rather then the game being bad.
in over 7 hours on gameplay so far ive experiance zero problems and the most fun ive had in ages. it's so much better then advanced warfare or ghosts.
Yeah, honeymoon period. I'd be interested how you're enjoying it in a couple of weeks.
Hate the player, not the game…unless it's COD then hate em both ;-)
Played a lot of COD in my time but the futuristic jet packs and all that BS doesn't appeal to me anymore(.. I think that's one of the reasons I like Battlefield and never liked Titanfall.
How about waiting for the reviews, then deciding, that way you won't get another Titanfall, Watchdogs or Aliens Colonial Marines
You forgot about Order 1886!
not sure about that one but I'm totally keen on that "the Division" that one seems cool
'Seems' being the optimal word. Since its reveal and now, the AAA market has been oversaturated in open world and sandbox games. Quite honestly I'm sick of the openness. It allows devs to reuse the same area of a map for multiple quests and say "Wow u can liek fight from multiple angles", Metal Gear Solid's prior history be damned.
Ubisoft delaying a game multiple times is evidence enough. They did this for another game, too. It was called Watch Dogs.
@FrankMcFuzz: yeah definitely "seems" is the word… Titanfall seemed pretty cool with awesome reviews as well
@lucas001: In this day and age, I trust the user reviews more than the critic reviews, because it's been proven that at least IGN gets paid for reviews. Hell, I love even Undertale with a passion, but 94 and 98 might be a bit large of a score to give it, whereas the user reviews were at a comfortable 8.2.
Users had to actually pay for the product on certain review services (steam), so they review it as a consumer. Second to that, if a game gets bombed reviews by hateful people on review sources where you don't need to own the game (metacritic), then it's still a good indication of a bad game. After all, it did something wrong to deserve the stigma.
A good example of this is Call of Duty.
Offline experience: Fallout 4
Online experience: Star Wars BattlefrontStar Wars Battlefront feels like its going to be like Titanfall in term of content. EA is not a company that like making games with content.
Why would they need to. Like most next gen games, they survive on hype, not quality.
Battlefront, you can get fallout whenever and it will be the same more or less.
You get into battlefront much down the track you will be coming against people who are elites and it will be harder for you to get into it.
good point.
Where the poll at? Fallout 4.
what's the cheapest price out there? A friend sent me this one as I missed out on the ebay deal: https://www.mightyape.com.au/product/Fallout-4-PC-Games/2303…
I'd choose Fallout. Been waiting for that one for a while.
Watchdogs was disappointing indeed.