Hey fellow OZ Bargainers,
Recently I've been noticing the new Health Star Rating on lots of products throughout the local supermarket. I've been comparing the star ratings of different products when I come across them.
I've noticed some products which have very high ratings (4.5 stars and 5 stars) that I would consider not too healthy and occasional foods.
For example: Milo has a star rating of 4.5 star rating however per 100 grams, Milo has 46.6 grams of sugar which in my opinion is high.
I've then noticed products such as salmon which are rated 2.5 / 3 stars - I would consider Salmon a healthy food as it is natural and unprocessed.
Somehow this doesn't seem right to me. I do try and eat natural foods with minimal added sugar.
What's more concerning, after looking into it on the Health Star Rating website it says:
"Food manufacturers and retailers are responsible for the correct and accurate use of the Health Star Rating system. This includes correctly calculating the Health Star Rating, accurately displaying nutrient information, ensuring consistency of information between the Health Star Rating and the Nutrition Information Panel, and complying with all relevant legislation and regulations".
It seems the government are handing the responsibility to food companies, the exact companies who want us to buy their products!
I'd be interested whether or not the Health Star Rating affects the products you buy?
I feel like this could be another campaign that might not be so successful…
For your info: http://healthstarrating.gov.au/internet/healthstarrating/pub…
Well, I noticed it recently and assumed it was a government initiative…. but if Milo is 4.5/5 stars then it sounds totally worthless!