This was posted 9 years 5 months 25 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Test Match - Crown & Andrews Board Game $34.95 @ Myer in-Store and Online. RRP $59.95

570
Test Match - Crown & Andrews Board Game $34.95 @ Myer in-Store and Online. RRP $59.95
Go to Deal
Cashback
mskeggs on 30/06/2015 - 13:46 myer.com.au (1110 clicks)
Last edited 02/07/2015 - 12:50

tonester points out Toys 'r' Us 10% price beat will take this to $31.46, see https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/199390

If you have fond memories of being huddled around the table playing this game when the cricket is rained out, take this chance now to prepare for the Ashes in the UK.
Plenty on hand at Myer Pitt St Mall Sydney.

Wrangle up all your friends and get set for hours of fun with CROWN & ANDREWS Test Match. This popular game is the ultimate table-top cricket experience. Play all forms of the game, including test match, one day, and 20/20.

Features:
• Ages 6+
• 2-22 players
• Play all forms of the game
• Includes table-top play mat, ball and player figures

Toys & Kids Board Game Cricket Crown & Andrews

Related Stores

MYER
MYER

closed Comments

  • treeman on 30/06/2015 - 13:50
    +1

    Classic game but I've actually never played!

  • [Deactivated] on 30/06/2015 - 13:56
    +1

    It's just like being there.

    • SteveAndBelle on 30/06/2015 - 14:28
      +21

      What, boring as hell?

      • SuperMatty on 30/06/2015 - 15:07
        +6

        The beer is cheaper though, so it's got that going for it.

  • thelastnoob on 30/06/2015 - 14:01
    -1

    Waiting for Bodyline edition

  • PlagueistheCheap on 30/06/2015 - 14:05
    +2

    players comfort 65%

  • majormick on 30/06/2015 - 14:16
    +1

    I thought the 2-22 players was a typo but apparently not!
    http://www.crownandandrews.com/games/index-family-games.php

    • tommy-darko on 30/06/2015 - 14:58
      +7

      Said in Benaud's voice.

  • SteveAndBelle on 30/06/2015 - 14:32

    Funny how the pictures on the covers of board games, even the new editions, are still as daggy as they were 'back in the day' ;)

    • blahman on 30/06/2015 - 15:14

      Because the non-daggy ones would be out in the nets.

  • Steptoe on 30/06/2015 - 14:37

    80's Flashbacks right here.

  • Dark Zeus on 30/06/2015 - 14:38

    2 to 22 players. BUT wait, why 22 players?

    • 2jzzzz on 30/06/2015 - 14:46
      +3

      11 each side.

  • billy_bob on 30/06/2015 - 14:39
    +5

    Fond memories playing this as a kid, we would bowl some wicked swinging balls by flicking the bowler's arm side to side as the ball was released. Not sure if this was strictly within the rules but it sure made it more fun! That was with the old version where the bowler had a long channel attached to his arm where the ball would roll down. The new one looks less fun with the bowler just flicking the ball.
    I would recommend trying to track down one of the originals.
    http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic92312_md.jpg

    • cornbeef on 30/06/2015 - 15:22

      I agree. I had the channel bowler back in yesteryear and the new version looks to be a serious downgrade of the game - to simply have a 'chucker' - so many no balls, so little patience.

    • pilchard on 30/06/2015 - 18:02

      So much fun.

      We would use one of the fence pieces as as extra long ramp down onto the bowler's arm ramp to get extra speed.

    • freefall101 on 30/06/2015 - 18:50
      +2

      looks like this wouldn't hold up to the old batting trick of lifting the back up a little so the bat caught on the pitch, built up some tension then released at a million miles an hour.

      Lost a lot of ball bearings to dad doing that.

  • thiosuxtube on 30/06/2015 - 14:39
    -7

    Worst game ever.

  • eneloop on 30/06/2015 - 14:44
    +1

    https://youtu.be/KlTZ-fNn9VY

    • SteveAndBelle on 30/06/2015 - 14:49
      +3

      Hey, hang on a tic! Didn't the original version have a big ramp for bowling and not the 'flick action' this one has? How we've progressed eh?

  • Ijuiceman on 30/06/2015 - 15:13

    I got one of these last year for my son and the quality is crap. Broke first time using it. They have changed the bowler and batter to the '80s version, so they are harder to use and fall apart. Took it back for a refund and got him the Xbox version.

  • Shark on 30/06/2015 - 15:23
    +6

    ah, the memories!! We painted all of our figurines back in the 80's and dad secured the whole set to a solid base board. We used to get some wicked swing bowling with the original set with the bowlers ramp. Here's a photo I took recently when I got it out again for a laugh….
    http://1drv.ms/1LF2WLY

    • cornbeef on 30/06/2015 - 15:32

      cracker

    • pilchard on 30/06/2015 - 18:11
      +1

      Ah and you had the scoreboard too. I think I got that for Christmas and my brother got the actual game.

  • timetoquit on 30/06/2015 - 15:31

    wow haha used to LOVE this board game.

  • somematt on 30/06/2015 - 15:41

    The reviews of this new version are very poor. If anyone finds any stock of the 80s version please let me know! Would love to get it for my nephew.

  • NigelTufnel on 30/06/2015 - 16:06
    +1

    Man… memories. Does the mat still need folding to get in the box? That was the worst design ever. Balls would roll all over the place with the 'hills and troughs' in the ground.

    • darmz on 30/06/2015 - 23:05
      +1

      Mum used to get so angry at me for leaving the iron on all the time. That felt got ironed more than my school shirts :)

  • kwijybo on 30/06/2015 - 16:30
    +3

    22 players? One batting, one bowling, one person taking it way to seriously and changing fielding positions all the time and 19 drinking I'm guessing?

    • jaybo on 30/06/2015 - 18:04
      +2

      21 drinking (everyone except the guy taking it way too seriously)

    • [Deactivated] on 01/07/2015 - 03:55

      Who's the umpire then?

  • [Deactivated] on 30/06/2015 - 17:05

    Good game, I'm pretty sure as a kid I had the mat stuck down to a piece of timber. Made it better.

  • betheball on 30/06/2015 - 19:48

    Bugger, I was so going to get this for my 8yr old, but reading the reviews has certainly put me off.

  • cannedhams on 30/06/2015 - 20:18
    +6

    My old man was too ghetto to get me the proper game so he picked up the ancient 1950s spin-the-wheel version at the op shop. I reckon concentration camp inmates had better entertainment options than that.

    https://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic85480_lg.jpg

    • PlagueistheCheap on 30/06/2015 - 21:18
      +1

      Oh man I still have that version at my parents place. I'm going to grab it next time I'm over there. Thanks for the nostalgia.

  • tonester on 02/07/2015 - 12:46
    +1

    $31.46 @ Toys"R"Us via 10% price-beat :)

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join