Are You More Willing to Buy a Product if It Is a Non-Rounded Price ($99.86) Vs. a Rounded ($99) Price?

The number of cents on a price tag might have a greater influence on which product you choose to buy than the number of dollars, according to new research.

Marketing researchers compared the impact of rounded and non-rounded prices, and found rounded numbers increased the chances of consumers buying a product when driven by feelings, such as a $100 camera for a summer holiday.

Non-rounded prices upped the chances of customers buying the same product when they were motivated by practical reasons, such as a $101.53 camera for a class project

So I guess the question begs is that what price do consumers prefer when they are looking for a good deal on a product.

"If you're on a holiday, feeling relaxed and great, and you see a camera for $100, you're going to think: 'Great bargain, great value, it's probably on sale and I'm going to buy it'," he said.

"If you see $99.74, you're going to think: 'Well that's full price, no one's going to put it on sale at $99.74'. We think it's not a bargain."

I don't really understand the logic of that. Why would anyone assume $99.74 is the full price? Surely $100 sounds more likely to be RRP?

Perhaps on a subconscious level I may do this but I really don't think it makes a difference as long as the item is good value compared to other retailers.

The Age: Numbers game: How prices get shoppers 'feeling right' about a deal

Journal of Consumer Research: This Number Just Feels Right: The Impact of Roundedness of Price Numbers on Product Evaluations

Well, let's see what the Journal of OzBargain poll says:

Are you more willing to buy a product if it is a non-rounded price ($99.86) or a rounded ($99) price?

Poll Options

  • 1
    I'm more likely to buy a product with a rounded price (e.g. $99).
  • 0
    I'm more likely to buy a product with a non-rounded price (e.g. $99.86).
  • 24
    Neither, whether the price is non-rounded or rounded doesn't make a difference.

Comments

  • Neither.

    It also depends on how the consumer finds said price.
    (Sale/Clearence tags with non-rounded amounts might be less likely to be viewed as "full price", whereas simply scanning the item up at a price-checker and drawing an even amount could invoke the "this is a bargain/good price".

    Regardless, in true OzBargain spirit, someone, somewhere has or is about to have it for cheaper.

  • +2

    No because $99 is cheaper.

  • +6

    One thing that does really sh*t me, is when the seller spruiks it as "LESS THAN $10", or "For UNDER $10", when it's $9.99. So it's actually not less, in 'real' terms.
    If they said "Less than $10", and it was say, $8, I'd buy it even if it was a turd sanger. Just as a token of my appreciation for their refreshing lack of gimmicky spruiker crapness.

    • +4

      +1. There really is nothing more patronising than seeing that little ".99" in the corner in tiny writing.

  • +3

    You are really asking the wrong crowd here because we are Professionals.

  • A lunch place I used to frequent charged $9.90 for their lunch special. This annoyed me as all these 10c coins were floating around. Then they increased the price to $10.10 and I stopped going. Breaking a $20 to get a handful of change back wasn't worth the effort. They should have just kept it at $10 the whole time and kept it simple.

    Though after learning the Target clearance method where you can tell if it will get a further reduction by the last cent digit, I do enjoy working it out.

  • +1

    I feel like I am necroing a dead post but I will say this, asking here wouldn't get any valid answers.
    The way that they've tested is significantly different from flat out asking. It would be like asking about whether someone would be affected by the bystander effect to said people, which would give no valid information.

    Though I guess this is really cool, in a way.

Login or Join to leave a comment