This was posted 9 years 10 months 27 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

18K White Gold Plated Double Ring (Engagement and Wedding) $19 for You Romantics + $7.50 Postage via Living Social

180
18K White Gold Plated Double Ring (Engagement and Wedding) $19 for You Romantics + $7.50 Postage via Living Social
Go to Deal
treeman on 27/01/2015 - 10:18 livingsocial.com (882 clicks)
Last edited 27/01/2015 - 11:59 by 1 other user

Sorry guys could not help myself but put this up when it popped up in an email this morning.

You get a Wedding Ring and Engagement Ring WHITE GOLD for $19. Your soon to be fiance' will love you, her friends will be drooling over you, her family will think you are amazing! What a bargain price and it's basically 2 for the price of 1!!

It says the value is $99 but we all know that you can't put a price on love, but now you can at $19! (+7.50 Postage)

Here are the details of this amazing package:

• Chainz Jewellery is your new best friend
• 18 karat white gold plated double ring is $19 (value $99)
• Engagement ring has a round cut stone made with Swarovski Elements
• Large stone surrounded by smaller stones made with Swarovski Elements
• Wedding band features rounds stones made with Swarovski Elements

For anyone out there looking to propose and think you can't afford $1000's well now you have an opportunity to buy these two amazing rings and be loved for life!

If you want to really spoil the love of your life, why not throw in a Sterling silver plated bracelet for a total of $25 (value $139)
Details for that amazing piece:
Bracelet is encrusted with sparkling cubic zirconia

$7.50 for postage.

Don't miss out!

Fashion & Apparel Engagement Ring Jewellery Wedding Ring

Related Stores

LivingSocial Australia
LivingSocial Australia
Marketplace

closed Comments

  • ozbking on 27/01/2015 - 10:20
    +16

    Sorry… My love is not worth the shipping…

  • MasterNoob on 27/01/2015 - 10:28

    But will it make her think the ring's worth 1000s?

  • dreamerman on 27/01/2015 - 10:28
    +7

    This could be the last straw….I am certain my wife will leave me.

    • Charity on 28/01/2015 - 02:19

      your wife prefers gold, right?

  • scorpweb on 27/01/2015 - 10:29

    gotta question the quality when a sterling silver bracelet is worth than that 2 white gold rings.

    • chonkie on 27/01/2015 - 15:33

      It's a total of $25. So that's $6 extra for the bracelet. That's Valentines, engagement and wedding covered!

  • CandyMan on 27/01/2015 - 10:30

    You get what you pay for
    How much tighter can an OZBargainer get :)

  • hawkers8905 on 27/01/2015 - 10:35
    +4

    If any of you actually got this for your partner, you are more than just a tight arse. This is not an ozbargain!

  • f38r1 on 27/01/2015 - 10:35

    What if she finds out??

  • LincolnLenny on 27/01/2015 - 10:54
    +2

    +1 because not all partners expect an expensive ring…..on second thought, time to revoke :P

  • UFO on 27/01/2015 - 10:58
    +5

    If you want to really spoil the love of your life…

    $19 for Engagement AND Wedding rings?? Damn, I'd hate to see what 'not' spoiling is!

    • Charity on 28/01/2015 - 02:12

      plus $7.50 postage for the true romantics

  • [Deactivated] on 27/01/2015 - 11:10

    "Sterling silver plated bracelet for a total of $25 (value $139)". WRONG.

    Then again anyone who believes his "fiance" will love him and her girlfriends will "drool" over him for buying this "amazing package" deserves everything he gets (or doesn't get, as the case should be). Even my blowup doll deserves better than rings worth 4 cups of coffee, and she's obviously not fussy or she wouldn't hang around with me.

    • treeman on 27/01/2015 - 11:48
      +11

      You do realise I'm joking around don't you?

      • [Deactivated] on 27/01/2015 - 16:28
        -3

        Not at all. Wasn't aware that posts having a lend were allowed but the killer is that it's little different from a lot of the other rubbish which is passed off as serious deals. Thanks for clarifying.

        • CandyMan on 27/01/2015 - 17:32
          +1

          Mayb a practical way to break up

    • lonewolf on 29/01/2015 - 09:42

      That is true, but why should anyone actually only love their partner or drool over him if he spends a certain amount of money on them. Sorry if that was the person i was with, i wouldnt be with them for very long. This is exactly why the divorce / break up rate is so high when the value of a material object is directly correlated to the value of the relationship / partner.

  • jv1988 on 27/01/2015 - 11:13

    Do we even know what size rings/bracelet is sent??

  • the1laz on 27/01/2015 - 11:16
    +7

    It's a trap!

    • LincolnLenny on 27/01/2015 - 15:44
      +2

      Everything to do with marriage is a trap.

  • Nilfunds on 27/01/2015 - 11:24
    +11

    just have to setup a romantic dinner at Maccas to give it to her.
    wear me new thongs too

  • congo on 27/01/2015 - 11:27

    One size fit all? How does that work ?

  • brongz on 27/01/2015 - 11:27

    am tightarse but not THAT tight to 'spoil' my love with this ring

  • altomic on 27/01/2015 - 11:48
    +4

    these are ok as decoy rings when travelling overseas. rather than lose or have stolen your sentimental and valuable original rings it's good to have a couple of "decoys" costing a dollar each to put your mind at ease.

    get a free Ring sizer and go to aliexpress and order from them.

    I ordered mrs altomic a cheapo decoy engagement ring for travelling with as well as wedding bands for both of us. The decoy engagement ring looks really good and many people have complimented her on it since. Which sort of amuses me as it was $1.29 and her actual engagement ring was about 10,000 times the price.

  • team teri on 27/01/2015 - 12:01
    +4

    I highly recommend this type of wedding ring (not necessarily this particular seller):
    http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/151405288800

    Tungsten Carbide.

    What could better symbolize eternal love than a material that will not scratch or wear off ever?

    Of course, people who try to measure love in $$$$ spent will not appreciate this at all. I feel kind of sad for them.

    • LincolnLenny on 27/01/2015 - 15:47
      +1

      Tungsten Carbide's the way to go, so cheap and practical. I don't really know too much about rings but heard once that the only reason it's not expensive is because it isn't a rare metal.

  • allergic2work on 27/01/2015 - 12:31
    +3

    for this price, does anyone else want to buy and hide in random desserts when out at a restaurant? then watch the drama unfold? maybe even start a slow clap? feels evil

    • chonkie on 27/01/2015 - 15:37

      Tactical confectionery. I like it.

  • Trance N Dance on 27/01/2015 - 13:29

    How much is the white gold worth?

  • GregFiona on 27/01/2015 - 13:31
    +6

    OP, please fix title. This is a Separation and Divorce Ring, not an engagement one

  • Dominic on 27/01/2015 - 14:10
    +1

    Intrinsically the same value as an engagement ring at a fraction of the price!

  • tsunamisurfer on 27/01/2015 - 14:46

    If the Swarovski Elements rocks have as much shine and lustre as diamonds, the girls will not care (provided they don't see the receipt).

  • massafiri on 27/01/2015 - 15:11
    +7

    Some of the comments above demonstrate how silly our society has become. We have literally put a price on marriage and love. Really, these rings should be sufficient - but they aren't - we're even cracking jokes about it.

    • Dominic on 27/01/2015 - 18:33
      +4

      Nothing says "I Love you" more than a common gemstone, hoarded by a cartel to inflate value, aggressively marketed to the insecure, mined by the oppressed, and the cause of many genocides and conflicts.

      • massafiri on 29/01/2015 - 16:19
        -1

        It's really sad - especially when we live in a time of "equality" - yet one partner needs to shell out for the other for a silly status symbol.

        • [Deactivated] on 29/01/2015 - 16:56
          -1

          What a load of tosh, on both counts. You're either one of the "entitled" or poorly informed about the meaning and status of equality.

        • massafiri on 02/02/2015 - 11:46

          @Possumbly: Care to enlighten me? How exactly would I be entitled in this context?

        • [Deactivated] on 02/02/2015 - 12:01

          @massafiri: Anyone who even vaguely thinks we live in a time of "equality" is either ignorant of the facts or sitting on the comfortably entitled side of the pendulum and blinkered to the obvious. A good place to start thinking about the issue might be the male/female divide. There's plenty more after that if you're really interested. I've returned the neg, as puerile as it is.

        • massafiri on 02/02/2015 - 12:33

          @Possumbly: I inverted the "equality" because I agree with your point, we do not live in a time of equality. Society is trying to aim for equality, yet we still believe in this artifact from a time of evident inequality.

          I didnt negged you, by the way.

        • [Deactivated] on 02/02/2015 - 13:42

          @massafiri: my apologies, to an extent, then. I did note the quotes but the rest of your comment - esp the "shelling out" bit - suggested otherwise. Couples don't neeed to follow convention and if they do as most do then it's not a one-sided matter of shelling out as you suggest.

  • bchliu on 27/01/2015 - 16:14

    Where's Michael Jackson's "I'm here to read the comments"?? haha

  • mapax on 27/01/2015 - 22:14
    +1

    Providing they didn't cause an allergic reaction, my wife would have been happy with these. She thinks jewelry is a waste of money!

    • [Deactivated] on 27/01/2015 - 23:41
      -1

      The logic escapes me, but then again so did the OP's sarcasm.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join