This was posted 10 years 8 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Nikon D3200 24MP DSLR Body $288.30 (after $50 Cashback) @ JB Hi-Fi

780
Nikon D3200 24MP DSLR Body $288.30 (after $50 Cashback) @ JB Hi-Fi
Go to Deal
mady123 on 23/01/2015 - 22:23 jbhifi.com.au (1531 clicks)
Last edited 23/01/2015 - 23:54 by 1 other user

Jbhifi offering 15% off on all major brands of Cameras up till coming Monday. After 15% off the price of Nikon D3200 body is $338.30. On top of it you can claim Nikon $50 cash back if you buy this Nikon Camera before 31st January 2015 which brings the price down to $288.30.

24.2 Megapixel DX CMOS Sensor
3.0” LCD Screen
EXPEED 3 Image Processor
Full HD 1920 x 1080 Video Recording
11-Point Autofocus
Live View
ISO 100-6400 (Expandable to 12800)

Price Comparison with other retailers:

Harvey Norman—Nikon D3200 Digital SLR Camera Body Only $499 before Cashback ($449 after cash back)
http://www.harveynorman.com.au/nikon-d3200-digital-slr-camer…

DigitalCamerawarehouse—Nikon D3200 DSLR Body only $401 ($351 after cashback)
http://www.digitalcamerawarehouse.com.au/prod8878.htm

Electrical & Electronics Camera Digital DSLR Nikon

Related Stores

JB Hi-Fi
JB Hi-Fi

closed Comments

  • nolimbs on 23/01/2015 - 23:11

    I've been very interested in purchasing a DSLR lately. Would it be better to purchase the Canon 600D with the kit lens ($456 - after $100 cash back) or this Nikon d3200 (buying another lense suitable for beginners). What's people's opinions on this?

    • Glodys on 23/01/2015 - 23:15

      I was also deciding between the d3100 and a 700d a while back and I ended up getting the canon purely because it had an AF motor in it.
      Just made buying lenses and things easier for me.

      • tonyjzx on 24/01/2015 - 00:02
        +1

        to be fair, just a slight price difference between a Nikon D3100 and a Canon 700d…

        as long as you dont use big lenses with the cheaper Nikons you're fine

        • [Deactivated] on 24/01/2015 - 18:06

          The lens with motors are generally better anyway, you can now buy G versions of the the D (D screw drive) lens nowadays and are up to the task of the higher MP bodies.

          The cheapo 50mm f/1.8D got updated with the G version so it works on these motor less bodies, same as the 35mm etc.

      • zealmax on 24/01/2015 - 22:50

        For me the articulated screen on the Canon makes it more functional. Especially for video. It can get awkward trying to view the screen when capturing video.

    • ro0sta on 24/01/2015 - 00:38

      One thing to consider is lenses. Do some thorough research on the range from Canon and Nikon (making sure you understand all the aspects and features of lenses), as that should guide your choice on DSLR purchase…mostly because a lot of the higher quality lenses (such as Canon L series) do a remarkable job holding a large portion of their original RRP; even when they're sold 2nd hand. I personally have had better experiences with Canon and currently use a 70D and a 7DII with 5 different lenses.

      • The Gent on 24/01/2015 - 08:09
        +1

        No brand bias here but I really do consider the Nikons to have the edge with lenses.

        Canon for bodies, sure, but Nikon's lenses are just…something else. I've always been put off by Canon being too scared to touch anything lower than F4 in their zoom range lenses, whereas Nikon has the gold ring series covering a range from 14-200 at F2.8 fixed.

        • ro0sta on 24/01/2015 - 20:01

          I actually think nikon have better bodies. In terms of indepth analysis on sensors compared to others in the series and competitors like canon available on the internet… i have read the 36mp sensor is the best in the world in a nikon body. Canon bodies perform better in low light. I cant comment on the gold ring lenses but you wouldnt have any worries using an L series red ring lens at f4 or lower even with zoo ysing propper quality lenses with Canon

      • zealmax on 24/01/2015 - 22:55
        +1

        The market that purchases this camera, would unlikely be buying L lenses or the Nikkor pro lenses. I would say the kit lenses & budget lenses are on par between Canon and Nikon. I know there are adapters around, but find that Nikon have more nice, cheap and old lenses on the market. Also have manual focus assistance in the form of a green dot in the view finder. If you are mainly shooting portraits where the subject is posing and not moving, then Nikon would definitely be worth taking a look at, for its range of older film camera lenses that use the same mount.

        • yuuki on 25/01/2015 - 19:06

          Exactly this. Chances are that if you're buying one of these - it's your first DSLR and it's unlikely you're going to be purchasing a Canon 24-70 f2.8L or the Nikon equivalent anytime soon - both of which cost 8x this camera body alone.

          Getting a DSLR and learning to use it at this point in time would be the most important thing. Majority of advantages such as 'better low light performance' are useless without basic camera knowledge.

          One will develop their own tastes in regards to system preference along with the specific points they need within a camera in the future, but for the time being - get out and just shoot.

    • bought on 24/01/2015 - 06:45
      +2

      Me too… But I m trying hard not to develop this expensive hobby…

    • mr_me450 on 24/01/2015 - 08:16

      The D3200 is a slightly better camera than the 600D, and it's cheaper here, so I'd be going with that. That said, if you already have experience with Canon cameras or have friends with Canon lenses that they can lend to you then it might be worth getting the Canon. If you're starting from scratch then you can't go wrong with either brand's SLRs; both are the industry leaders and are continuously leap frogging each other with their advancements.

    • Tuttorix on 24/01/2015 - 08:53
      +1

      It will always depend on your needs, if you're looking for video, I personally recommend Canon. However if you want the mobility and lower pricing, for only basic capturing with photography, go with Nikon.

      Just a personal opinion.

  • DEvok on 24/01/2015 - 00:02

    Oh dam its 30 cheaper without the lens, how much is that work if bought separately?

    • syousef on 24/01/2015 - 10:56

      Dude you can't get a lens for $30. If you want the lens $30 is a bargain.

    • bluebluebird on 24/01/2015 - 14:13
      +2

      Where do you get for $30 more with kit lens? Thanks

  • Kapinny on 24/01/2015 - 00:02
    +7

    as a person who has gone through the whole process, would strongly recommend everyone to not purchase a kit lens and invest in better glass. Money is better spent on a prime f1.8 35mm or 3rd party tamron 17-50 f 2.8. You will find yourself bored of the kit lens after a few months.

    • Tuttorix on 24/01/2015 - 08:54

      I personally dislike the Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 because of abberations and the bokeh. I prefer the Canon 16-35mm F/2.8 but then again, it IS an L Series lens that's got a USM.

      • ErYan on 24/01/2015 - 13:20

        For the price, that Tamron lens is very good value. Abberations can be fixed digitally if they bother you and for a 2.8 lens bokeh is not an important consideration. Much better to get the Tamron than any kit lens.

        Also agree on the Nikon 35mm 1.8 and the 85mm 1.8. Excellent value, high quality lenses.

      • btst7000 on 25/01/2015 - 01:14

        For APS-C, why not go with the Sigma 18-35 f/1.8?

        • Tuttorix on 26/01/2015 - 09:45

          Future proofing for Full Frame later, is my personal belief.

    • [Deactivated] on 24/01/2015 - 14:02

      Kit lens is usually cheap. For beginners it's pretty useful to have one.

      Prime lenses are great but you can still get stunning photos with variable focal length. For a beginner you can get very good, acceptable photos with a kit.

      • zealmax on 24/01/2015 - 23:01

        As slow to focus the kit lenses may be. They are sharp and produce results that are far better than any mobile phone or compact. I would definitely get a kit lens for $30 extra. They are really good fun and cheap, so you don't have to worry about throwing them around or taking them to more extreme conditions. I have quite a large lens collection, but miss the kit lens. Sold it off when I sold my old camera.

        What good is photography, if it isn't fun?

    • [Deactivated] on 24/01/2015 - 14:05
      +1

      Terrible advice. If you know nothing about photography, stick with the kit lens until you are comfortable and know exactly what you want, then upgrade from there. Not everyone wants to shoot with a fixed focal length or heavier and bigger zoom lens, so why get that first if it might end up not being your style?

      • yuuki on 25/01/2015 - 19:09

        ^this is 100% spot on - you will develop your own style as time progresses which will determine the lenses you need.

        You'll be able to determine yourself when that time comes, you'll know exactly what you need in a lens by that time.

  • TheOneWhoKnocks on 24/01/2015 - 07:44

    Just out of interest. Are these made in Japan? And would the f1.8 35mm as suggested above, be sufficient and suitable for a beginner like me. Thanks in advance.

    • dhie20 on 24/01/2015 - 08:08
      +1

      Prime lens is the best. 35mm or 50mm.
      if you want a little bit zoom, get 17-50 f2.8 from sigma/tamron

    • mr_me450 on 24/01/2015 - 08:09
      +2

      Pretty sure the D3XXX series is made in Thailand. If you're just a beginner then I reckon you'd be happy with the kit lens (18-55 f3.5-5.6). It's actually a pretty decent all-rounder lens. The 35mm f1.8 is obviously a faster lens and is going to do much better in low light conditions, but you'll lose the zoom range of the other lens if that's useful to you.

      • jpl on 24/01/2015 - 10:03
        +1

        Very well said @mr_me450.

        @TheOneWhoKnocks, if you are absolute beginner that is willing to learn all the basics, this deal https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/179383 with 2 lenses for $300 seems a little bit better.

  • scuderiarmani on 24/01/2015 - 07:53

    I have a D90 with 3 lenses. What sort of model would I be looking at to get an upgrade? Things like built in WiFi and a high shot rate (I like using it at motorsports)

    • mr_me450 on 24/01/2015 - 08:04

      You'd probably be looking at something like the D5300. If you have more money to spend then don't get the recently announced D5500 as it's not as significant upgrade over the D5300, wait for something like the D7200.

    • dhie20 on 24/01/2015 - 08:06
      +3

      You will regret if jump from D90 to D3200. Get D7000 or D7100 instead. I don't bother for wifi, just add wifi module for d7100.

      • [Deactivated] on 24/01/2015 - 20:49
        +1

        D7000 is still a great buy, D7100 has the same sensor as the D5200/D3200 but has the auto focus system from the proish body D300s.

        D7100 isn't that great for sports as it has a small buffer, something like 4-5 shots in RAW and its full. I'd take the D7000 any day if you don't need video. Wifi cards are like $50 these days.

        this link will make it easier to decide https://www.whirlwire.com/compare/d3200-vs-d5300-vs-d7000-vs…

    • syousef on 24/01/2015 - 10:58
      +2

      D7100 if you want all the controls or need to shoot fast action.

      D5300 if you don't ever plan on doing off camera flash and none of your current lenses require an in camera body. GPS, Wifi and tilting screen. 60fps 1080p (vs 1080i on the D7100) if you care about video.

      The D7100 is also on special and the price isn't bad.

  • scuderiarmani on 24/01/2015 - 08:27

    Thanks guys, some food for thought, while I don't need it so much, it may not stop me buying one at the right price :)

    • TechAddict on 25/01/2015 - 20:50

      Why upgrade from APS-C to another APS-C? D90 is still a great camera so if you really need to upgrade, go full frame like the D610 or D750. If you have primes, then they will be full frame lenses withoutvthe crop factor.

  • bluebluebird on 24/01/2015 - 09:44
    +1

    Should be ok to get Teds to price match at 338 and pay via amex and get another $50 back.

    • unity1 on 24/01/2015 - 09:46
      +1

      We think alike.

  • unity1 on 24/01/2015 - 09:44
    +1

    Amex card holders could try and get a price match at Teds and save a further $50. Possibly $238.30 after AMEX rebate and Nikon cash back.

  • Osiris on 24/01/2015 - 10:23

    Man these things have come down a lot, that's a pretty awesome price even without the lens.

  • 9erence on 24/01/2015 - 10:23

    Called Ted Syd CBD and they said can't do price match because it's too low. Any thoughts?

    • Foma2 on 24/01/2015 - 10:31

      Buy it from JB Hi-Fi ;-)

    • unity1 on 24/01/2015 - 10:34
      +3

      Tell them (Ted's) to remove that price promise statement from their website. It's obviously not true.

    • syousef on 24/01/2015 - 10:59
      +2

      Thought: Price matching guarantees are outright lies and ought to be illegal.

    • Mely on 24/01/2015 - 11:28
      +2

      No luck for me either. Promises don't come easy, they are not as good as officeworks.

      • unity1 on 24/01/2015 - 12:02

        I just called Teds and they said they couldn't match the price. Their best price was $410. No deal.

        • Mely on 24/01/2015 - 12:56

          They told me $400.

      • [Deactivated] on 25/01/2015 - 12:12

        Teds online are usually better at price matching. Tried the Knox store for a separate lens and they wouldn't come near the competitor, but Teds online with the help of Amex managed to beat it :)

  • Pandabargain on 24/01/2015 - 11:26

    Could someone please link a lens that I should buy? Amateur - never had a DLSR before

    Thanks!

    • jpl on 24/01/2015 - 11:45

      What type of photos are you expecting to take? and your budget for the lens?

      • Pandabargain on 24/01/2015 - 12:51

        Would prefer to spend around $200 or less. Take photos of random things?

        • [Deactivated] on 24/01/2015 - 14:09

          A kit lens would be best for you. People will say they're horrible but for an Amateur they're completely fine.

        • Pandabargain on 24/01/2015 - 14:44

          @Austrosaurus:

          Where do i get one of them please =)?

        • jjsnacks on 24/01/2015 - 15:12
          -1

          @Austrosaurus:

          Until they stop using the dslr as they can't tell the difference between their smartphone photos and dslr.. Get a 35mm 1.8 to go with the kit lens

        • yuuki on 25/01/2015 - 19:12
          +1

          @happyantix:

          Stick to the kit lens until you decide that you want or need a prime. Better to develop a style and determine what you need before diving into buying lenses.

          Having a kit lens will exhibit it's limitations in regards to what it can do, something to guide the user into the points they look for when buying a new lens.

    • jva on 24/01/2015 - 12:21
      +3

      18-55mm kit lens is good enough for learners.

      • zealmax on 24/01/2015 - 23:05
        +3

        Yes, good advice. 18-55mm focal length is probably the most useful focal length for a crop sensor camera. I think people get carried away with "bokeh" and blurred backgrounds. Reminds me of that tourist that took photos in front of the opera house, but all of the backgrounds were so blurred, you could hardly make out where he took the photo.

        I would also advise on purchasing a flash. Flash makes all the difference in indoor photography. Can pickup a simple one on ebay for $50(manual flash).

    • Max Power on 24/01/2015 - 15:43

      These links are to JB Hi-Fi to show you the examples, but you can probably find them cheaper elsewhere.
      18-55mm "Kit" lens
      or zoom with your feet with this one:
      35mm prime lens

      • Pandabargain on 24/01/2015 - 15:56

        What is the difference in terms of quality?

      • ankor on 24/01/2015 - 16:40

        Should I get a 35mm lens in addition to my 50mm lens?

        • Max Power on 24/01/2015 - 20:52
          -1

          If you already have a 50mm prime lens, then you probably don't need a 35mm prime lens.

        • Foma2 on 24/01/2015 - 18:53

          You can get kit lenses in a very good conditions for cheap when people are upgrading their lenses.
          But personally I would get something like Tamron 18-55 2.8 when it on sale, and a cheap 50mm prime for portraits.
          And a second hand kit telephoto ~50-300, ~70-300, ~50-200 (whatever Nikon has).

        • scyth3r on 24/01/2015 - 18:53

          Yep eglobal are legit. I bought my camera body and lenses from there

        • Trance N Dance on 24/01/2015 - 19:11

          @Foma2:

          Kit telephotos are horrible…

        • Pandabargain on 24/01/2015 - 19:21

          No one answered if I need VR or VRII =9

        • Foma2 on 24/01/2015 - 19:34

          I cannot say anything about Nikon telephotos but Pentax 50-300 is pretty good.
          I got a 50mm 1.7 almost straight away and I have upgraded my 18-55 within first year.
          But 55-300 is with me for 6 years by now and I have no intention to spend more money on telephoto.
          A telephoto lens is a good investment if you have a DSLR body but you won't use it as often as ~16-50 one unless you are a really keen wildlife or outdoor sports photographer.

        • Foma2 on 24/01/2015 - 19:34
        • CVonC on 24/01/2015 - 20:06

          Legit but grey import

        • Max Power on 24/01/2015 - 20:57

          @Pandabargain:
          VRII is the newer version. If the prices are similar, get the newer version, otherwise whichever is cheaper.

    • syousef on 27/01/2015 - 21:52

      You need to decide what you want to take pictures of before you decide what lens to buy. You can shoot many things with many lenses but below gives you an idea of some of what you can look at.

      For a beginner:
      Low light shots, no flash - a prime 35mm or 50mm. Graduating to f/2.8 zoom lenses as you get better.
      Sports, wildlife, can also do good portraiture - Something that starts between 55 and 70 and ends between 200 and 300.
      Fine detail of small things - macro lens
      Portraits - A prime lens with a focal length that is somewhere between 85 and 120mm…or stick with the kit lens and start playing with off camera flash.
      Landscapes - can be shot with many focal lengths
      Shots in tight spaces - wide angle lens

      …and there are more even more specialized lenses. Go onto the Internet forums and look at what people are doing and the photos they are posting and work out what you want to do and what they are achieving with their equipment. Talk to them about whether they like it, or what's newer and better out there.

  • inferno6688 on 24/01/2015 - 11:47

    do you guys think this is a worth while upgrade from a D60?

    • jva on 24/01/2015 - 12:21
      +2

      Positive.

  • Bludgeman on 24/01/2015 - 15:31
    +2

    Got 1. Used my cc points for $300 jbhifi e gift cards. Paid $38 and submitted for $50 cash back :)
    Thanks OP

    • Agret on 24/01/2015 - 17:07

      Which CC?

      • [Deactivated] on 24/01/2015 - 20:59

        coke rewards maybe

        • legelas on 25/01/2015 - 01:27

          should be his points via using his credit card

        • neil aus on 25/01/2015 - 06:01

          @legelas: after spending, what, $30,000?

        • Agret on 25/01/2015 - 10:11
          +1

          @neil aus: yearly expenses add up quickly, may as well get points for them.

        • legelas on 25/01/2015 - 16:42

          @neil aus: yeah I used to pay my international tuition fee with credit card. $20k a year + living cost. Easily over $30k a year. If you have a family and use credit card often yes, you can get a lot of points. He may also save a lot of points over years and now he spent it all :)

      • Bludgeman on 25/01/2015 - 12:28

        Westpac altitude black

  • neil aus on 25/01/2015 - 06:14

    Anyone know of a good price on a Nikon d5300?

  • aboutconfig on 25/01/2015 - 15:52

    hey guys, which no. on the jb hifi receipt is the receipt no.?

    • mady123 on 25/01/2015 - 19:26

      Number next to JBNSN::………..

      Located at bottom left corner of the receipt.

  • aboutconfig on 25/01/2015 - 17:27

    can u make two application of cashback if u buy two？

  • srhardy on 26/01/2015 - 08:53
    +2

    I am a PRO photographer that shoots nikon/canon, here is my take for what its worth.

    This is a great camera but the 18-55VR lens is an amazing lens! Yes i have a bag of primes but the humble 18-55VR would be my 1 lens on a desert island lens! I keep a couple of cheap Nikon/DX cameras in my work bag for JUST IN CASE MOMENTS that occur far too often or where weather, rocks, water or rain means i don't want a 5k camera body and 2k lens at risk for a shot. Bingo, my sacrificial 3000X or more often 5000X is pressed into service and the reason is as simple as my customers cant tell the difference in images between it and the FULL FRAME nikon shots!

  • bluebluebird on 26/01/2015 - 11:15

    Got 1 with 18-55mm kit len from TEDS for $488.00 less $50 Nikon CB and Amex $50 credit - TEDS is already having promo less $50 with the kit len

    I could have just ask for Body only and get the 18-55mm from grey import but with TEDS it is local stock.

    • Mely on 26/01/2015 - 13:32

      My local JB priced the kit for $512, so 15% off makes it $435.20.

      • bluebluebird on 26/01/2015 - 15:54

        My local JB checked there is no body with kit for sale - they are all separate i.e. selling body $338 + $149 (len) - esp. none on the website. If there is, it would be great for me to have TEDS to price match.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join