Coles Express is selling Coca Cola 375ml cans for $1
To make this deal even better you could buy 20 cans and qualify for the 10cents spend $20 in store offer.
Example:
If you fill up 50litres of fuel X 10cents + 4cents regular discount = 14cents = $7 Discount.
Cost of 20 cans = $20 - $7 = $13/20 = 65cents per can.
Of course your savings will vary depending on how much you fill up.
I believe they would come out of the fridge so yeah.
I can confirm that it does
If you fill up 50litres of fuel X 10cents + 4cents regular discount = 14cents = $7 Discount.
Cost of 20 cans = $20 - $7 = $13/20 = 65cents per can.
Of course your savings will vary depending on how much you fill up.
But you have the 4c discount regardless. So really by buying 20 cans you save and extra $5
Makes the cost of cans $15 = 75c a can
A great deal if you got 20 mates in the car that want a cold drink, otherwise buy a pack on special for about 67c each and forget this extra fuel discount..
you could buy 20 cans
Not much of a bargain
solution, coke zero.
plus this deal is about single cans anyway.
Problem, Aspartame/Artificial Sweeteners.
Problem, Aspartame/Artificial Sweeteners.
i fail to see the problem….
my apologies, but i take my science from scientists and peer reviewed sources
i don't take it from celebrities, facebook shared pages or forum posters
if that makes me a simpleton then so be it, if only more of the world used some critical thinking in their lives and lived the 'simpleton' life we would be better off
@SBOB: You wouldn't know peer-reviewed if it jumped down your throat; please spare me your burdens of proofs predicated on methodologies you don't even understand yourself. Yes, white lab coats and thick glasses equals science, we know, we get your infantile, pop culture grasp of politically-correct conformity.
None of what I linked to is connected to Facebook, forums or celebrities; funny you mention those three things as they are precisely what keep people like yourself from ever crossing your own Rubicon.
Let me return the favour here and continue not to read anything you write subsequent to this post.
what keep people like yourself from ever crossing your own Rubicon.
if thats the metaphor you base your argument/science/facts on, then it shows that regardless of any opposing information you have already 'passed the point of no return' and your views will remain unchanged..
that is the exact opposite of scientific or critical thinking, and the kind of 'forum poster' i referred to earlier that I do not base my information from..
Why does he assume the sugar is doing the damage? There are plenty of other substances in Coke, plus it is carbonated which many of the other sugary other drinks he mentions aren't. If he did the same experiment with another type of drinks as well, I might put some faith in his conclusions, but as it stands what he did is scientifically worthless. Also different countries and different types of drink use different types of sugar which may have a different impact on the body.
For example the orange juice they have for breakfast, the sugar they have in their coffee, the blended fruit drink and the piece of fruit they have in the afternoon, all add up to the same amount of sugar that’s in ten cans of Coke. The sugar in orange juice and Coke causes the same reaction in your body.
I know people who only drink fruit juice and eat mostly fruit, but they certainly don't look like his 'after' disaster picture.
Sensationalist rubbish.
I think ten, 375ml servings of anything a day for 30 days straight would produce adverse health effects; even water, as you'd be flushing out way too many minerals (especially sodium) from your bloodstream, leading to Hyponatremia.
Good point
"…even water, as you'd be flushing out way too many minerals (especially sodium)"
I disagree. Drinking 4 litres of water a day would not lead to a sodium deficiency, if you had a normal diet (i.e. one containing a bit of salt).
4 litres is ridiculously excessive.
You do know the old 8 glasses of water a day adage is bunk (especially for people in temperate climates doing mild exercise) and can actually be detrimental to some people's health depending on the robustness of their kidney function?
"4 litres is ridiculously excessive."
This assertion is ridiculously simplistic, because it is demonstrably false in numerous contexts.
And how about a response to the statement I actually made Amar, rather than a poor attempt to change the subject?
are they cold cans?