Hi guys,
I've seen a couple of discussions around recently that relate to mistaken descriptions. Some of these are kinda wafty on the details but I think I have a good example to discuss.
Now see here http://www.birite.com.au/index.php/panasonic-55-full-hd-3d-w…
Here we have a TV being sold for $1,367.
The title of the page says it's a Panasonic THP55VT60A.
The title above the description says it's a Panasonic THP55VT60A.
Basically it's a great price for the VT60A. But is it the VT60A?
The description of the VT60A specifically identifies the monitor as a THP50ST60A, and the specs also relate to the ST60A.
Let's now go to buy now. If you follow it all the way through, you'll eventually get this on your Paypal:
PANASONIC 55" Full HD 3D WiFi Camera Web Browser NeoPlasma TV THP55VT60A
Item number:THP50ST60A
Item price: $1,242.73
So I think we all know that if you were to proceed with the order, you would in fact recieve the ST60A. However, could you argue that a VT60A was in fact the TV that you paid for and make them supply one to you?
Thoughts?
they would say they dont have stock, issue an apology, give you a full refund and tell you to try again :)